Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/As The Dust Settles, Revealing Those Seldom Seen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 06:51, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- As The Dust Settles, Revealing Those Seldom Seen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable book apparently published by a high school class. No sources of any kind, no Google hits. It's a class project. Realkyhick 04:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep http://www.tribune-democrat.com/local/local_story_311225548.html, also I would like to do an article on this project coming up. The same people are involved as the people from the Seldom Seen Mine Book project.
It has to do with our state and we, the staff of the project, have been awarded a sum of money only a few schools have been awarded around the country. Could you please read this short article and tell me what you think of a wikipedia.org page on this? Thank you. Gingysnap08 13:40, 03 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep http://www.tribune-democrat.com/scholasticshowcase/local_story_319134204.html, here is the site where a local newspaper has reported on the matter of the book project. There are copies being sent all over the state of Pennsylvania and one is going to Washington, D.C. for history reasons on our state. If this is not enough to have an article about the book, please let me know. Gingysnap08 13:37, 03 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; very nice school project, which is the problem. — Coren (talk) 05:10, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete With no sources whatsoever it is impossible to verify that this book was ever actually published (by an actual and notable publisher, that is). It looks like a school project, and while there is a small possibility that it is not, without proper sources we have no way of knowing. Calgary 05:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable and apparently non-notable. Jakew 12:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep how can I prove to you all that this book exists? Should I give you the publisher's name or something? Gingysnap08 16:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment That would be helpful, yes. Also, if you could also supply details of third-party sources (newspaper articles, for example) that discuss it, that might be evidence of notability. Jakew 17:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The third-party sources are really what we need. The notability criteria for inclusion in an encyclopedia is not just whether or not something exists, but whether it has been important enough for other people to write about it in reliable secondary sources.--Yannick 17:08, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with out sources it's hard to believe that this book exists and if it does it's not notable. Oysterguitarist 20:11, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless third-parts sources can be provided. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 20:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.